Marylander and I both used the ballots from the spreadsheet and ran tabulations, and votingtheory.com came out on top for both of us. (we did it separately, I hadn’t noticed his results when I posted mine)
Electoralscience.vote didn’t come out particularly close. But we did notice that the last ballot submitted was not included in the tabulations that had electoralscience.vote winning (and that ballot gave votingtheory.com a 5 and electoralscience.vote a 0).
You are welcome to check my work in the two Codepens linked above.
I went ahead and got forum.vote a few days ago based on preliminary information, simply because I hadn’t heard anything more and the deadline was approaching. Since the old forum is still working, and I haven’t gotten any final word, I’m just going to wait to finish up. I may not have a lot of time to work on it for a few days, so my hope is the old forum stays working for a bit more.
Edit: I relooked at the spreadsheet that looks like this;
The numbers at bottom are way off. I think they might be correct numbers, but with the names rearranged, ummmm… randomly? For instance, the numbers shown for votingtheory.com
add up to 50, not 36, electoralscience.vote should be 42 not 55, and electoraltheory.com
should be 36 not 54, and forum.equal.vote should be 25 not 53. (again, this is before the final ballot which put votingtheory.com
(one thing I find interesting: if you don’t count that last ballot as is the case above, votingtheory.com remains the Condorcet winner and Cardinal Baldwin winner, however it is in 4th place as far as its Score tabulation, which means it does not win under STAR…)